|
|
Post by swl on Jan 20, 2010 16:58:59 GMT
sWL You haven't even voted yet! I did. Then I retracted. Then I did. Then I retracted. It's soooooooooooo difficult to choose. |
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 20, 2010 17:24:59 GMT
Are you asking specifically for this to get a by to the 2nd round, or are you just trying to wind me up by suggesting new films once the poll has closed? Yes Little boys who don't give straight answers, don't get the P of the C entered into the contest. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2010 17:46:15 GMT
can we vote for the same one more than once? who won anyway?
|
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 20, 2010 17:48:24 GMT
can we vote for the same one more than once? who won anyway? If you and SWL don't start taking this seriously . . .  |
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Jan 20, 2010 17:49:08 GMT
Those who set a poll can see who has all voted and who hasn't, and you will all be able to see the poll results, so hopefully that will convince you that there is no jiggery pokery in this important matter. I have voted, but I'm very annoyed about at least two irregularities I have detected in this process: 1. Where's Herbie? I've never heard of this Bananas mutation. 2. I couldn't find any pokery whatsoever in any of them, not even Mary Poppins. (I have seen a pokery version of SW&tSD, but I'm pretty sure the credits didn't mention Disney.) |
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Jan 20, 2010 17:57:12 GMT
If you and SWL don't start taking this seriously . . . The arse goes red before Riot's rod of iron is applied. What's that all about? Is it some unspeakable Glasgow thing us working-class lads who call a granny a Gran'ma are not privy to, here in the soft south? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 20, 2010 18:24:52 GMT
ive been studying the smacked bottom smileys you referred to there, because i must admit it did seem a kurious turn of events for the bottoms to go red before the afore mentioned 'rod of iron' had been applied. on closer inspection ( i watched it about 8 or 9 smacks in a row..does this make me some kind of smiley s&m fetish pervert type chap?) ENNN EEE WAAAY i finally concluded that in fact the smileys are bending over, presenting their behinds for punishment and then pulling down the lower half of their 'attire' as such, ape-ing the way a punished schoolchild from days of yore would sometimes have to pull down their trousers befre punmishment was applied to the posterior, like the type of thing that doesnt happen anymore. except to smileys on messageboards. who dont wear trousers. so we have inadvertently stumbled onto the discovery that smileys are in fact wearing some kind of apparel, underneath which they are naked. im off to watch it some more.
|
|
|
|
Post by tarzanontarmazepam on Jan 20, 2010 18:28:18 GMT
I'm very sorry but I devised and created the 'survivor' game. I believe I have a case to sue Riot, Patrick and Stub Crouch. I will consult my solicitors tomorrow morning.  (Unless of course hard wedges of cash come my way)  |
|
|
|
Post by tarzanontarmazepam on Jan 20, 2010 18:30:26 GMT
Not that I'm Chris you understand...(DAMN)  |
|
|
|
Post by everso on Jan 20, 2010 18:47:50 GMT
Trubs, Beauty & the Beast IS in there. Everso, are you asking for Alice to get a by into the 2nd round like Pocahontos? If poss. Yes. |
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Jan 20, 2010 18:56:58 GMT
ive been studying the smacked bottom smileys you referred to there, because i must admit it did seem a kurious turn of events for the bottoms to go red before the afore mentioned 'rod of iron' had been applied. on closer inspection ( i watched it about 8 or 9 smacks in a row..does this make me some kind of smiley s&m fetish pervert type chap?) ENNN EEE WAAAY i finally concluded that in fact the smileys are bending over, presenting their behinds for punishment and then pulling down the lower half of their 'attire' as such, ape-ing the way a punished schoolchild from days of yore would sometimes have to pull down their trousers befre punmishment was applied to the posterior, like the type of thing that doesnt happen anymore. except to smileys on messageboards. who dont wear trousers. so we have inadvertently stumbled onto the discovery that smileys are in fact wearing some kind of apparel, underneath which they are naked. im off to watch it some more. I love such dedication. Please be sure to report back with your findings. Meanwhile, I think it's yet more proof that Riot was at Fettes. It would explain a lot. PFSD. Post Fettes Stress Disorder. I bet PFSD gets a mention when Blair is up before Chilcot. Whether he ever actually appears or not. Not that the whitewash will be any the less this time over, regardless. |
|
|
|
Post by everso on Jan 20, 2010 19:01:29 GMT
ive been studying the smacked bottom smileys you referred to there, because i must admit it did seem a kurious turn of events for the bottoms to go red before the afore mentioned 'rod of iron' had been applied. on closer inspection ( i watched it about 8 or 9 smacks in a row..does this make me some kind of smiley s&m fetish pervert type chap?) ENNN EEE WAAAY i finally concluded that in fact the smileys are bending over, presenting their behinds for punishment and then pulling down the lower half of their 'attire' as such, ape-ing the way a punished schoolchild from days of yore would sometimes have to pull down their trousers befre punmishment was applied to the posterior, like the type of thing that doesnt happen anymore. except to smileys on messageboards. who dont wear trousers. so we have inadvertently stumbled onto the discovery that smileys are in fact wearing some kind of apparel, underneath which they are naked. im off to watch it some more. Of course! I saw straight away that the smiley pulled down said trousers, showed pink behind which was then soundly thrashed, turning it bright red. |
|
|
|
Post by swl on Jan 20, 2010 19:14:20 GMT
I voted again.
|
|
|
|
Post by housesparrow on Jan 20, 2010 19:26:46 GMT
ive been studying the smacked bottom smileys you referred to there, because i must admit it did seem a kurious turn of events for the bottoms to go red before the afore mentioned 'rod of iron' had been applied. on closer inspection ( i watched it about 8 or 9 smacks in a row..does this make me some kind of smiley s&m fetish pervert type chap?) ENNN EEE WAAAY i finally concluded that in fact the smileys are bending over, presenting their behinds for punishment and then pulling down the lower half of their 'attire' as such, ape-ing the way a punished schoolchild from days of yore would sometimes have to pull down their trousers befre punmishment was applied to the posterior, like the type of thing that doesnt happen anymore. except to smileys on messageboards. who dont wear trousers. so we have inadvertently stumbled onto the discovery that smileys are in fact wearing some kind of apparel, underneath which they are naked. im off to watch it some more. Of course! I saw straight away that the smiley pulled down said trousers, showed pink behind which was then soundly thrashed, turning it bright red. No, my behinds stay yellow. The they stay where they are and it all happens again, They must be enjoying it. |
|
|
|
Post by everso on Jan 20, 2010 19:30:02 GMT
How very odd.
|
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Jan 20, 2010 19:43:03 GMT
I seem to have fallen among perverts. Heaven knows what my gran'ma would've said. Probably "I warned you Robert [my dad] -- that's what happens when you marry a Catholic!". (Only met one gran'ma -- the other one was in Australia. Never met any gran'da at all. One dead, the other in -- you guessed -- Australia.) |
|
|
|
Post by sesley on Jan 20, 2010 19:57:03 GMT
for new Disney films the Pixar ones ,there is Toy Story, number 3 film is out in June my son votes for that and Wall E he votes for that too. ;D Those DVDs get played over and over again. He is 10 and has ASD,the uncomplicated story lines and easy to follow plots are perfect entertainment for him.  |
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Jan 20, 2010 20:29:07 GMT
Now Sesley has voted and SWL hasn't . . it's crazy.
SWL & Costal - I only used the 'smack bottom' smiley because there wasn't one for slapping you round your heads and giving you a stern look.
Weyland - The Herbie movie in the poll represents all Herbie movies. Like a hoover represents vacuum cleaners. OK?
I will rule out a whole bunch of movies after round 1, add in all the new suggested ones that I decide have passed the courtesy test, and we'll go again.
However, I am not going to rule in all of Trub's suggestions, as nobody's ever heard of most of them and I suspect she is just showing off.
Chris/TOT, you just aren't very good at this undercover-posting thing, are you? ;D
I reckon the winner's probably obvious already (several people have predicted it and the voting, so far, reflects this) so the really interesting battle will be for 2nd and 3rd place.
|
|
|
|
Post by housesparrow on Jan 20, 2010 20:34:57 GMT
I'ver only seen a few of them so it wasn't hard to choose.
My cousin, brought up on Kipling's stories, hates Disney's Jungle Book and would never forgive me for voting for it... you don't need to know whether I did.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Hooligan on Jan 20, 2010 20:37:48 GMT
I voted. I love democracy.  AH |
|
