|
|
Post by everso on Mar 30, 2009 17:42:38 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by swl on Mar 30, 2009 17:49:21 GMT
Wasn't me neither.
|
|
|
|
Post by sesley on Mar 30, 2009 18:22:09 GMT
poor Alfie,but a lucky escape at least he won't be paying his pocket money for it or needing to join the fathers for justice group ,which means he can put his spiderman suit on for the next school fancy dress or trick or treating at halloween.
|
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Mar 30, 2009 18:52:20 GMT
You can prove that I suppose?  |
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Mar 30, 2009 18:54:14 GMT
Apparently, the British press have been told not to report this. why?  |
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Mar 30, 2009 18:54:53 GMT
poor Alfie,but a lucky escape at least he won't be paying his pocket money for it or needing to join the fathers for justice group ,which means he can put his spiderman suit on for the next school fancy dress or trick or treating at halloween. Yes, god, it's too weird to contemplate.  |
|
|
|
Post by swl on Mar 30, 2009 18:58:29 GMT
You can prove that I suppose? Either that surgeon was having a laugh 10 years ago or he did cut the right bits. |
|
|
|
Post by trubble on Mar 30, 2009 19:34:16 GMT
Did he seem a particularly prankish type?  |
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Mar 31, 2009 9:59:44 GMT
Apparently, the British press have been told not to report this. why? High Court Order. Presumably to protect children who have been the victims of sexual abuse. Mind you, your head might explode working out who exactly the sexually abused child is in this scenario, but I'm assuming it's to do with that. |
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Hooligan on Mar 31, 2009 10:27:03 GMT
poor Alfie,but a lucky escape at least he won't be paying his pocket money for it or needing to join the fathers for justice group ,which means he can put his spiderman suit on for the next school fancy dress or trick or treating at halloween. Indeed. Poor lad, roped in by a nasty little slapper. AH |
|
|
|
Post by housesparrow on Mar 31, 2009 10:31:00 GMT
I thought it was the lad's father who was painted the villain of the piece, AH - unless of course he is the "nasty little slapper"?
|
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Hooligan on Mar 31, 2009 10:38:31 GMT
I thought it was the lad's father who was painted the villain of the piece, AH - unless of course he is the "nasty little slapper"? The little skank who had several choices as to who had fathered her baby is the slapper...  AH |
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Mar 31, 2009 10:45:17 GMT
I thought it was the lad's father who was painted the villain of the piece, AH - unless of course he is the "nasty little slapper"? The little skank who had several choices as to who had fathered her baby is the slapper... AH Women are as free as men are to sleep with multiple sexual partners as a general rule. I appreciate that there are 'circumstances' about this case, but the basic principle remains. |
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Hooligan on Mar 31, 2009 10:50:06 GMT
They are still slappers though....especially when they are still at school and they don't know which one of several lads fathered their kid (even though they were supposedly going out with only one of said lads). The words "unfaithful", "dishonest", "skanky" and "school bike" spring to mind with this one.
AH
|
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Mar 31, 2009 10:55:43 GMT
They are still slappers though....especially when they are still at school and they don't know which one of several lads fathered their kid (even though they were supposedly going out with only one of said lads). The words "unfaithful", "dishonest", "skanky" and "school bike" spring to mind with this one. AH Fair enough . . but what does that make the boys who were sleeping with her? Heroes? |
|
|
|
Post by swl on Mar 31, 2009 11:01:11 GMT
They are still slappers though....especially when they are still at school and they don't know which one of several lads fathered their kid (even though they were supposedly going out with only one of said lads). The words "unfaithful", "dishonest", "skanky" and "school bike" spring to mind with this one. AH Fair enough . . but what does that make the boys who were sleeping with her? Heroes? Sad |
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Hooligan on Mar 31, 2009 11:02:30 GMT
Maybe the lads were just desperate for shag? I don't particularly remember lads who scored with the easy chicks ever getting any kind of hero respect for it, what's to respect when any of us could've nobbed these girls.
BTW, I don't make the rules that govern society and it's attitudes, I just know that loose, easy girls are generally not very well respected or admired...why respect somebody who doesn't respect themselves?
AH
|
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Mar 31, 2009 11:08:23 GMT
Maybe the lads were just desperate for shag? I don't particularly remember lads who scored with the easy chicks ever getting any kind of hero respect for it, what's to respect when any of us could've nobbed these girls. BTW, I don't make the rules that govern society and it's attitudes, I just know that loose, easy girls are generally not very well respected or admired...why respect somebody who doesn't respect themselves? AH Maybe the girls are just 'desperate for a shag' too . . . But a girl who shags around doesn't deserve respect according to you, which is fair enough. But surely the same is also true for blokes who shag around? |
|
|
|
Post by Alpha Hooligan on Mar 31, 2009 11:16:33 GMT
Not by me they ain't. It's a bit like boasting that you can tie your own shoe laces isn't it...hardly some sort of massive achievement.
AH
|
|
|
|
Post by housesparrow on Mar 31, 2009 12:23:50 GMT
If criticism is to be levied at the girl, it is in pointing the finger at Alfie when she must have known there could have been other condenders for the title. Possibly she was put up to it because someone told her she would get publicisty (and cash?) if her baby had a 13 year old for a Dad.
|
|
A.P.P.S
S C 
