|
Post by riotgrrl on Aug 23, 2012 16:01:28 GMT
And, using these limited tools (of logic and the English language) you're calling me (and SWL) liars. I didn't. You seem to see a lot of things in life as battles, with sides. All I do is struggle through, noting facts, meeting people, and having a laugh. I didn't call anyone a liar. What it all boiled down to was that I didn't agree with your -- frankly ridiculous -- definition of pornography. I couldn't exactly "side" with that. It's all in the thread, as you know, and I won't embarass you by dragging out the details -- such as the above-mentioned definition -- yet again. Fuck you Weyland, really. Your definition of porn was 'dirty pictures' (what??) I stated that pornography was a social construct and couldn't be defined by this picture or that angle, but by the context in which it could be found. - - - - What is it that makes you so unwilling to even contemplate that porn may be more extreme, and is definitely more available than it was previously, and that we might like, as a society, to think about whether this is a good thing or not and how it might affect sexual expectations and behaviours. To me that is a mild and perfectly reasonable assertion. But for some reason the men got all defensive, mocking and sneery at even being asked to consider that proposition. - - As I say Weyland, fuck you. It doesn't matter how you spin it. You called me a liar on that thread in your haste to be 'one of the lads'.
|
|
|
Post by riotgrrl on Aug 23, 2012 16:04:01 GMT
(And furthermore, like everyone else on GWD, you said nothing at all but just 'enjoyed' my personal integrity being repeatedly and viciously attacked. The only person who ever called anyone out on any of it was Mikado, who is a gentleman and a scholar. So all these pleas for me to return to GWD are falling on pretty deaf ears . . I'm not willing to be the entertainment any longer. Although, judging from the porn thread, you're able to find other ways to amuse yourself.)
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Aug 23, 2012 16:55:29 GMT
Fuck you Weyland, really. Your definition of porn was 'dirty pictures' (what??) Once again, I didn't. I called erotica naughty pictures. You called erotica pornography. I can easily prove it, should you so desire. All you can do is misquote me and use foul language. This is your very own "social construct", verbatim: "I've said my definition of porn is material designed to arouse." "If my definition of pornography is 'material designed to arouse' then, unless you are defining 'erotica' as something different from that, then it seems obvious that I would include 'erotica'" "I defined porn as material designed to cause arousal. That would seem to include erotica." "The definition of pornography is material designed to arouse. Does that include mild erotica? Well yes, obviously, if it is material designed to arouse." Not me, Riot. Read the thread. Nobody said anything like that. Unless you know better, of course. I dare say it would be, were it but true. Shite. Unadulterated shite.
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Aug 23, 2012 16:57:15 GMT
(And furthermore, like everyone else on GWD, you said nothing at all but just 'enjoyed' my personal integrity being repeatedly and viciously attacked. The only person who ever called anyone out on any of it was Mikado, who is a gentleman and a scholar. So all these pleas for me to return to GWD are falling on pretty deaf ears . . I'm not willing to be the entertainment any longer. Although, judging from the porn thread, you're able to find other ways to amuse yourself.) Bollocks. I've defended you more than once on threads near and far. Never again.
|
|
|
Post by aubrey on Aug 24, 2012 6:36:49 GMT
Come on, you two - this isn't right.
|
|
chris & the giant peach
Lovely & Happy!
I spy with my little eye something beginning with....?[N4:#####]
Posts: 175
|
Post by chris & the giant peach on Aug 24, 2012 14:59:05 GMT
Oh dear. What has gone on here?
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 24, 2012 16:42:17 GMT
Oh no, riot has flounced! This is awful!
I will have to read the whole of the GWD thread now.
|
|
chris & the giant peach
Lovely & Happy!
I spy with my little eye something beginning with....?[N4:#####]
Posts: 175
|
Post by chris & the giant peach on Aug 24, 2012 18:26:04 GMT
I have long since discovered that life is way too short to fret about messages on an intertweb message forum. Besides the Stub is about fluffiness. Isn't it? And before I forget all the best Aubrey. Hope you remain as well as can be.
|
|
|
Post by Patrick on Aug 24, 2012 22:41:15 GMT
Gosh!
|
|
|
Post by aubrey on Aug 25, 2012 8:53:12 GMT
And that's swearing.
|
|
chris & the giant peach
Lovely & Happy!
I spy with my little eye something beginning with....?[N4:#####]
Posts: 175
|
Post by chris & the giant peach on Aug 25, 2012 10:27:14 GMT
Horrendous language!
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 26, 2012 9:24:04 GMT
Any news of a reconciliation?
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Aug 26, 2012 10:07:11 GMT
Any news of a reconciliation? You talking to me, lady? As you know, Riot has flounced, having already flounced from GWD a while ago. She's a serial flouncer. That's all I know.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 26, 2012 11:03:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Aug 26, 2012 12:37:41 GMT
Never heard that before. I also learned "spittin' feathers" from a Scouser. What I meant to say was that I know nothing of any reconciliation, and Riot -- the original conciler -- is incommunicado. I'll be at the GWD Meet on 22 September. If she's there I will do my level best, but I'm afraid it's a fond hope. Is anyone else from SC interested in attending that Meet? Let me know. So far I know that Ev and I will be there (I've booked the coach). Sparra will be away on holiday.
|
|
|
Post by jean on Aug 26, 2012 18:08:17 GMT
Never heard that before. I also learned "spittin' feathers" from a Scouser. Strictly speaking, you didn't learn that from me - you learned it from a boys' secondary modern in South London in the 1970s.
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Aug 26, 2012 20:51:31 GMT
Never heard that before. I also learned "spittin' feathers" from a Scouser. Strictly speaking, you didn't learn that from me - you learned it from a boys' secondary modern in South London in the 1970s. Highly unlikely, Jean. But I'd like to know your line of reasoning anyway . . .
|
|
|
Post by aubrey on Aug 27, 2012 6:23:31 GMT
I think I'll be there. Can't promise 100%, like.
|
|
|
Post by everso on Sept 2, 2012 12:21:45 GMT
Oh Lord. I'm away for a week on holiday and this happens!
I know Riot has taken a lot of flak recently on GWD but I'm surprised about her resigning this board.
Not much to be done. I keep in touch with her on Facebook and by occasional email, but obviously it's her choice if she doesn't want to come back to the boards.
I hope she does though, as she's a great poster.
|
|
|
Post by Weyland on Sept 19, 2012 17:19:12 GMT
I think I'll be there. Can't promise 100%, like. What now, Aub? Will you be there? Ev and I were wondering.
|
|